This a except from my Fuzz Guide. If you have in interest in the science, history, devices and use of fuzz check it out.
9 Tips and Tricks to Making a Fuzzier World
1. EQ
EQ is the friend of fuzz and a dedicated EQ unit can do a lot more than a simple tone control. It helps you sculpt the fuzz to the sound how you want. This is especially useful for big aggressive thick fuzz. They can get out of hand quickly so EQ can be used to tame unwieldy fuzz. Scooping out some midrange is a common practice. Also it can be used to clean up any offending harshness in the highs. It you like a ballsy bass fuzz EQ can give your bottom end a big deep kick. For more info on EQ see my guide.
2. Fuzz For All
Fuzz is not just for guitars. Of course a lot of bass players love it but it can add its special character to anything. It is great for synths. A nice fuzzy synth bassline can liven up a track. But fuzz can really be used on anything from drums to vocals so keep an open mind.
3. Good Noize & Bad Noize
Fuzz pedals are noisy but there is some kinds of noize you just don’t want especially when the pedal is off. Fuzz pedals can also “tone suck” even when off. This can be especially true of vintage and fuzz wah pedals. The way to get around this is using a true bypass pedal or modifying one to be true bypass or using a bypass loop. True bypass is really a buzz word in the world of guitar pedals but you shouldn’t get carried away. Each true bypass pedal you patch together is like attaching another length of cable together. And well all know what happens with long runs of cable linked numerous times. You get signal loss that can start to effect your sound. There is nothing wrong with the buffered switching in most modern pedals. It is often a good idea to mix true bypass with some buffered pedals or use a line buffer.
4. Playing Nice With Others
When playing with band members or recording it takes some work getting fuzz to play nice with others. If you are using thick fuzz with octave up or ring modulator sound that sustains forever you run the risk of overpowering the other instruments. Again EQ is your friend and don’t over do the volume. Recording gives you more options to deal with all that fuzz. Not only can you utilize equalization but you can use panning as well to carve out a nice cozy space to move your fuzz into.
5. Too Much of a Good Thing
You may want to wrap yourself up in a thick blanket of fuzz but there is such a thing as to much of a good thing. There are a lot of great tracks that are solid fuzz but that is not always the way to go. The juxtaposition of clean and dirty sounds can be a wonderful thing. Also fuzz kicking in for the chorus can really add a dramatic impact.
6. The Order of Things
The order of effects is important. There is nothing wrong with guitar->fuzz->amp but if your setup is more complicated the order of the effects can really make a big difference. While there are typical orders there is no such thing as the right order. Experiment to see what sounds best. If you are working in the virtual world you can easily try out a lot of different orders and complex routing without having to deal with patch cables.
7. The Sincerest Form of Flattery
If you are looking to emulate someones sound Guitar Geek’s Rig Database is a good place to start. Google is also your friend. Once you find out the artist’s gear remember when you are trying to capture that famous sound the whole signal chain matters including the guitar. Now some of those vintage pedals and other gear is hard to find or just way too expensive for most people but there are usually clones of most famous vintage equipment at a more reasonable price. Most of them sound pretty close and sometimes even better than the original. I believe that you can get close, but exact matches may be impossible. Consider that vintage pedals often used different transistors in the same model and old germanium transistors can vary quite a bit even if it is the exact same part. Plus so much of anyone’s sound is in their fingers and soul. Also be aware sometimes an artist’s gear is modified by themselves or their guitar techs. Also if you are after a sound on a studio album often the sound on the record is different equipment used in the artist’s live setup. A big chuck of the a records sound is due to the things outside the signal chain going from guitar to amp. The effects of a mic and its placement, mixing and even the room it was recorded in have a big effect on the sound. Still with careful research and shopping you can probably can get a satisfying famous tone.
8. Be a Mad Scientist
Copying someone else’s sound is alright but but coming up with your own is even better. Fuzz and all distortion sounds started off as accident. Overworked amps and malfunctions gave us fuzz. Happy accidents and experimentation were how all those great sounds were found in the first place. There are millions of things to try. You could split your signal and send two different fuzz’s to two different amps. You could mix in modulation effects, use radical EQ settings, user a filter, modify your equipment, play through a cheap transistor radio or old beat up speaker, mix clean and fuzz sounds, try weird mic placement and spaces, strange tunings etc., etc. Nothing is out of bounds.
9. Silicon and Germanium
Germanium is kind of a buzz word when it comes to fuzz. The important fact is that the germanium transistors were lower gain the the silicon variety and provide a a less harsh distortion. Many players consider germanium a much more organic sound. Some people prefer germanium and some silicon. Is a matter of preference.
Worst of Music Making Tech or Keytars and Bad Software
The Internet seems to really be good for a few things. Besides porn and bad homemade videos it seems to be good for lists. I used to love ‘em, list that is, but all the Internet lists seem to have burned me out of lists. So, I have resisted as long as I could making a list but a discussion of the worst music making technology overwhelmed me and I just have to make this list. I refuse to number them though tyhe are generally in order.
The Keytar Mostly Harmless
I am all for innovation. Taking an old idea and making new again is a wonderful thing. Except in the case of the keytar. People had been generally sitting and facing keyboard instrument for centuries and it seemed to be the most natural way to do it. It was conducive to playing well but when plastic and the microchip made keyboards light enough to sling around the neck someone just could not resist. The only reason that seems to make sense is aesthetics. The keytar would allow the keyboard player to jump around strange like the rest of the band and look cool. Of course this was a horrible flawed idea. Jumping around with a keytar slung around you amid big poofy hair and a laser light shows of the 80’s made you look like an ass. They should have known. Mozart, Fats Waller, Jerry Lee Lewis, Glen Gould, Kraftwerk etc, etc, were cool enough sitting behind the keyboard. And there have been many keyboard players able to give quite a psychical interesting performance with out every worry about a miss step on stage leading to laser induced blindness. As cheesy as the Keytar is it never really caught on so it is not that terrible. I ‘ll rate it using the words of Douglas Adams, “Mostly Harmless.”
Antares Auto-Tune Unintended Purposes Gone Awry
This of course is had to be on the list four for letters C-H-E-R. That damn song. It may have not even been Auto-Tune on Cher’s Believe but it spawned countless auto-tune imitators. I can see the point of the software. It has to be a god sent for the overworked studio engineer. But it potential for abuse is great so it has to make the list. This is one of the those effects that can easily be gimmicky rather than musical. Even if used they way it is supposed to, you have to question the need for perfect. Imperfection adds charm, character and humanity to music. I will take a few wayward notes that move me any day.
Vocoder The Robot Takeover
I happen to like the vocoder but like Auto-Tune they have a huge potential for abuse. The rate higher on the list than Auto-Tune because they have less real practical value. You can use Auto-tune or a vocoder for similar effect so this is just a guilty. They can be an amazing effect like in the case of Kraftwerk’s Autobahn but are over abused and gimmicky (see T-Pain.)
Vocal Synthesis Software Not Fooling Anyone
Vocal synthesis can be cool it a retro robotic way like DECtalk Stephen Hawking or Commodore 64 8-bit kind of way. It does not sound real but that is cool. The problem is when it is meant to sound real. String, wind and brass instruments have been far form mastered by any synthesis so an instrument with even more articulations than those instruments, the human voice, attempts at realistic synthesis have been laughable. We can hear a person mood, age, or whether they are telling the truth even if they are speaking in a foreign language and out of site. Human voice is the sound we hear first and listen the most. Software like Cantor and Vocaliod have fallen far short of convincing. It is a questionable endeavour to replace the one instrument most of us already have in the first place and unlikely man can improve on nature.
The Mastering Plugin the Death of Dynamics
In truth the Loudness Wars (you can check out my thoughts on The Loudness Wars) started even before there were such plugins but the made it much worst. Dynamics are dead and it was a death by convenience. It is just too easy to slap on a plugin with maximizer in the name and squeeze all the dynamics out of it. I imagine some was watching television and heard one of those used car dealerships commercials that seem twice as loud as anything else for 30 unrelenting seconds and thought wouldn’t be great to do this to music. That person did us no favors. The software is affordable and easy enough to use for anyone to use and abuse. Resulting in most music today having the life squeezed out of it.
The Music Video-Video Killed the Radio Star
The Bungles were prophets. The video has to be the single worst technology for music making. No other technology has done as much to remove the focus of music away from music. The Music Business has always been Show Business so image always has been a component but post MTV image became the only components of in some cases. I can’t image the talented but ugly artist I never got to hear because of the video. I hold the music video responsible for the Boy Bands, the Britney Spears types, hair metal, commercial rap, 4th generation gunge and a thousand of other music travesties. It is great homogenizer of genres. It is the reason lyrics are not important as how much Ice is on your necklace. It is the reason that is more important to look the part than be the part. It is the central cog in the PR machine manufacturing celebrities set to music rather than musicians. The influence of the music video is so corruptive that even MTV (music television) barely has music on an mainly broadcast “lifestyle programing.” Music Television is not even about music anymore.